What’s for dinner?

Last week my group chat turned into a support group for grocery shopping. I can’t be f**ked with doing the food shop and meal planning for the family, one message said.

Then, a minute later, the line every one of us knows by heart. But then you realize if you don’t do it, everybody would starve. She summed up my whole feeling in three words. Too much pressure.

Then the joke landed. Can’t Claude do it for you?

Everyone laughed. I laughed too, and then I stopped, because it wasn’t really a joke.

It’s decision fatigue.

Three grown women, mid-week, mid-life, hitting the exact same wall over the exact same task at the exact same time, and reaching for a joke because the alternative is admitting how much it’s actually costing them.

Decision fatigue isn’t about being tired. It’s about running out of decisions before you run out of day. Every choice draws from the same pool, whether it’s a client contract or which sauce goes in the cart. As a business owner, those decisions get spent early. What to quote. Who to hire. What to say when a client pushes back. By five o’clock, when dinner shows up, there’s nothing left in the tank to decide with. It’s not the size of the decision. It’s what time of day you have to make it.

And here’s what I didn’t want to admit for a long time. I was running a business on frameworks, decision trees, and documented processes, and running my own kitchen on vibes.

There’s a version of this that used to happen almost every week. Kids in bed, one lamp on, phone in hand. I’d scroll TikTok and Instagram for half an hour looking for dinner ideas, saving recipes I’d never open again, because I couldn’t face making the same three meals on rotation for the fourth week running. That’s not meal planning. That’s a second job with worse pay.

I’m not the mom who cooks a separate dish for each kid. We all eat what’s been cooked. I do take everyone’s preferences into account, but the meal is the meal. That was never the problem. The problem was making the same decision from scratch every week, with no memory of what worked last time and nothing carrying the weight for me.

So I built a system with AI. The same way I’d build one for a client.

Subscribe now

The food shop happens once now, on Sunday, for the whole week. The week runs on a rotation, not a new decision each night.

It shows me what’s being served tonight instead of asking what everyone wants tonight. Only one of those questions is exhausting.

It’s not perfect. Some weeks the after-school activity schedule runs long, we walk in the door with no time to cook, and dinner is a takeaway. That’s not the system failing. That’s the system working, because there’s no six-thirty negotiation with myself about what to do instead. The plan already has a slot for exactly this.

Here’s the part that actually matters, and it has nothing to do with dinner.

If I don’t do the food shop, no one eats.

If I don’t move the business forward, we make no money.

Same stakes, different outfit. Both non-negotiable. Both willing to take every spare hour I have.

A founder spends her decision pool all day on the business, then treats whatever is left over as personal time, as if the tank refills. It doesn’t. Dinner was never a big decision. It’s just the one that lands after the pool is already empty.

This isn’t really a story about dinner. It’s about needing a system for anything you do more than once, at home or at work. If you can systemize dinner, you can systemize anything you’ve been improvising.

One thing I love about AI is how it makes life simple. I built a Family Meal Plan Skill that remembers my family’s likes and dislikes so I don’t have to hold that in my head every week. It builds the rotation, the grocery list, and enough variety that we’re not eating the same three meals on repeat. No more scrolling TikTok at eleven at night looking for inspiration. No more standing in the aisle trying to remember who won’t eat mushrooms.

The skill or prompt is below for Global Citizens.

If the hour you spend deciding what’s for dinner is an hour you’d rather spend on the business, or on the floor with your kids, this gets that time back.

Read more

I packed anyway. We landed anyway. And for a long while after that, I was still the American woman from England who happened to be living in Doha. Not someone building anything here. Just someone waiting to see if this was a mistake.

I didn’t open up to this place because I decided to one morning. I opened up because staying closed was exhausting, and because somewhere around month eight I noticed my daughters had quietly stopped asking when we were going home. Doha was home to them already. They had friends whose parents came from six different countries and thought nothing of it. They’d started answering “where are you from” with a shrug and three different answers instead of one. Watching them settle before I did was its own kind of correction.

What actually changed my mind wasn’t the weather or the apartment or any of the things people assume make a move abroad feel worth it. It was the options I started seeing for my kids that I never would have had in America or England. It was a culture that welcomed people from everywhere without asking them to explain themselves first. It was slowly, unglamorously finding a handful of people who understood exactly what it costs to leave everything familiar behind, because they’d done it too.

That’s the part nobody tells you before you go. The leap itself is the easy part. You sign the lease, you book the flight, you say the brave thing out loud to your friends at the goodbye dinner. The actual work starts after you land, when the adrenaline wears off and you’re standing in a kitchen you don’t recognize, in a country where you don’t know a single grocery store, wondering who you’re supposed to call when something goes wrong.

I’ve watched this play out with almost everyone I know who has made a similar move. The first year is disorientation dressed up as adventure. You’re too busy setting up a life to notice you haven’t built one yet. It’s the second year, when the newness wears off and you have to decide whether to keep resisting or actually plant something, that tells you who you’re going to become in this place. Some people never make that turn. They stay tourists in their own home for years, always half-packed, always comparing everything to what they left. The ones who do make the turn are the ones who go looking for their people instead of waiting to be found.

Building a global life was never really about the location. It was about becoming someone who could sit in discomfort long enough to find community on the other side of it. Someone who could let her kids define home differently than she was taught to. Someone who stopped treating “settled” as a place you arrive and started treating it as something you build, slowly, on purpose, usually with people you didn’t know a year ago and now can’t imagine your life without.

That’s exactly what Home Abroad has spent its first year doing for people making this leap in every direction, to every country, for every reason. And for its one year anniversary, they’re opening something I think is worth your time.

They’re calling it the Wall. It’s a place to answer one question: where in the world are you building your life? Maybe you’ve already made the move and you’re two years in like me, finally exhaling. Maybe you’re mid-leap, still unpacking boxes and unsure if you did the right thing. Maybe you haven’t gone yet and you’re just starting to let yourself imagine it. All of it belongs there.

Every name that signs the Wall is entered to win a full year of Home Abroad. Ten keys are being given away. Two of those go further, into a private half hour at Kaila’s own kitchen table, one to one.

Entries close July 11. The keys are drawn live on July 13.

Go add your line. Tell them where you are, or where you’re headed, or where you’re still deciding. Somewhere on that Wall is someone who’s about to make the same leap you did, and hasn’t found their person yet.

Sign the Wall

Subscribe now

The thing I love most about these rooms has nothing to do with strategy. It’s sitting across from another person who runs a business and being understood without a long explanation. I run a business that lives mostly online, and most days I love that. Some days it’s quiet in a way that gets to you. Face to face is the antidote.

I’m grateful that Duane steps in when I travel. He always does. Part of why I go at all is for Elise and Mia. I want them to watch their mother build something real and still be there for the moments that matter.

The night before I left, I had a call with one of my business besties that ended with me in tears.

I hadn’t called for that. I called to check my thinking on a change of direction for the business. She talked me through it. That part was fine. It was what came after that that undid me.

She told me I don’t need to do anything else. That I already do a ton. She knows me well enough to know what I do with a mastermind retreat like this. I leave activated. I come home with a list. I’m an implementer, so I get to work. She was telling me to stop before I’d even started.

Then she said the thing she had no way of knowing. She was tired of watching me work this hard and not get the results I keep chasing. That was the exact word I’d been carrying and hadn’t said out loud. Exhausted.

She asked me what I’m actually after.

I told her I wanted to contribute to my household. That I needed something of my own. And then I stopped, because I heard it. I do contribute. I’m raising two daughters I’m proud of. I am already the thing I was describing as missing.

She called me a hyper-achieving woman. I was offended. Then she kept going, and the offense turned into something harder to dismiss.

She said I don’t trust myself with myself. I hire people and don’t let go, because somewhere I don’t believe the work will be done right unless I touch it. So it comes back to me, which proves the story, which makes me hold tighter. I bring in coaches and switch strategies before the last one has had time to work. I make decisions I’m certain will move the business forward, and most of them just create more work. I have spent years in motion and called it progress.

Then she said the harder one. I don’t trust my husband to support me. Not in the small ways. In the real one. I have carried a belief since the day I married him that I need to produce more in order to provide more. No one has ever said that to me. Not Duane. Not once. I woke up with it one day and let it drive almost every decision I’ve made since.

I know where it comes from. I was raised by a single mother who worked several jobs to keep us. I watched provision look like exhaustion. I think I decided, when I was young, that this is what taking care of the people you love costs.

Here is what made it land. I have none of this hesitation with my clients. I trust myself completely to get them where they want to go. I have watched it play out across dozens of businesses, and I can usually see the path before they can. The doubt only shows up when the business is mine and the life is mine.

I have been in business for fifteen years. Married for ten. When I look at the people I started alongside, about half of them have lost something real. A marriage. Their health. The business itself.

I decided early that I would not be one of them. I was not going to put the business before my marriage. I held that line, mostly. I won’t pretend it was clean. There were nights I told myself a few more hours would fix it, and that everything would be fine.

What I see now is that the hours were never the real threat. Plenty of women work hard and stay married. The threat was the story underneath the hours. The quiet belief that I had to keep producing to earn my place in my own home. That belief doesn’t announce itself. It just keeps you at the desk and away from the table, chasing a finish line that moves every time you get close.

That is what I think ends things. Not the work. The reason for the work.

I have spent the past seven years making my life harder than it needed to be. I have been chasing an end result while standing in the middle of everything I left corporate to build. I live a life I could not have imagined in 2011, the year I walked away from my job with no proof this would work. My children are experiencing more at their age than I did at mine. By most measures, I was already there.

If you are a high-achieving woman, I’d ask you to do the thing I resisted. Take an honest inventory. Not of what’s left to build. Of what you already have and keep overlooking because you’re still pushing for more. Notice where you don’t trust yourself. Notice where you don’t trust the people who would carry it with you if you let them.

Sometimes the wall you keep hitting is one you built. And you can take it down the same way.

Leave a comment

Most founders build a life they're too busy to live. This is about stopping long enough to claim it.

Friday night, Mia and I went to dinner. Just the two of us.

She talked the whole time about summer. What she’s hoping for, what she’s planning, what she’s excited about. Nine years old and already fully in it. I just sat across from her and listened.

Saturday morning, Elise and I had time before her therapy appointment. She walked me through her gymnastics schedule. Different trainings coming up, coaches she likes, what she’s working on. She had things to say, and I was there to hear them.

Then Duane and I went to brunch to celebrate a friend’s birthday. We actually spent time together. Present. Not passing each other in a hallway.

One weekend. Every person in my family, one-on-one.

Subscribe now

I want to be honest about something. When we first moved to Doha, I was surprised by how easy life felt. There’s a particular quality to living here that I didn’t expect and couldn’t have predicted. Things move with ease. There’s space to think. Space to take care of yourself. Space to just be a person and not just a founder or a mother running on empty.

I didn’t fully let myself have it. I kept looking ahead. At what I should be building next, what the next big opportunity is, what more could look like.

But here’s what I’ve been sitting with lately.

I have enough. Not as a consolation. Not as a retreat from ambition. As a true reckoning with what’s actually in front of me.

Here’s what I think you might be doing too.

You built a business that could fund a different life. A bigger life. And instead of letting it, you’ve been feeding it back into the machine. More clients. More offers. More growth targets. Because stopping feels like settling. Because enough feels like giving up.

It isn’t.

Your business was never just a revenue number. It was supposed to buy you time. Presence. Options. The ability to be at the gymnastics meet without checking your phone three times. The ability to take your kid to dinner on a Friday and actually be there for the conversation instead of mentally drafting emails.

That’s what the business was for.

My business is built. My clients are served well. My team handles what needs handling. I manage my US client work in the evenings on my own terms, and I am not working every single night. That was a design choice. A hard one. But it holds.

And because it holds, I got to sit across from my nine year old at dinner and be nowhere else.

Apple to apples, if we were still in the US, I’d be working full-time just to have the same lifestyle we have here. The cost of living, the quality of time, and the space to be present with my kids during the years that actually matter. None of that happens without the business being designed to support a life, not consume one. And none of it happens without Duane holding a corporate role that gives our family stability, I don’t take for granted.

This is a two-income household that chose a global life. And because of that choice, I got a weekend that looked like nothing special on paper and felt like everything.

There’s a certain kind of quiet luxury in the Middle East that doesn’t translate on paper. It’s not about opulence. It’s about ease. The ease of a life that has room in it. Room to think. Room to be present. Room for your kids to grow into themselves somewhere new, and for you to actually watch it happen.

We’re closing out our second year in Doha. And I’m finally letting myself see what that means.

But I want to say this clearly, because I think you need to hear it too.

You don’t need to earn this. You don’t need one more launch, one more client, one more quarter of proof before you’re allowed to design a life that fits. The business you have right now, if it’s structured right, is already capable of funding the life you keep putting off.

The question isn’t whether you can afford to go global.

It’s whether you’re willing to stop building long enough to actually live in what you’ve built.

That’s the part nobody talks about when they think about going global. It’s not just a location change. It’s a permission structure. Permission to stop running from something and start building toward something that actually fits.

This is what I’m calling global life.

Leave a comment

Two daughters with packed schedules, a business running across three time zones, and a husband who rewrites the dinner plan with zero warning. Sunday nights used to be me staring at three different calendars trying to figure out how we were all getting where we needed to be without someone missing swimming practice again.

Then one Sunday, I stopped managing it manually and built an AI skill that does it for me. It pulls every calendar, checks project deadlines, surfaces the three things that have to happen in the business that week, and gives me a full picture in the time it used to take me to open my laptop and log in.

I didn’t hire anyone. I didn’t subscribe to another app. I built a skill in Claude.

That’s when I understood what most people get wrong about AI. Prompting is where you start. It’s useful, and it works. But most people stop there, and there is so much more available past that first step.

Here is where most people stop

There are four levels to working with AI, and almost everyone is living at Level 1.

Level 1: Prompts. You type a question, you get an answer, you close the tab. The next day, you go back and type the same kind of question again, and AI has no idea who you are, what you’re building, or what you said yesterday. On top of that, most prompts are too vague to get anything worth keeping. It works well enough to seem useful, and that’s exactly why most people never go further.

Level 2: Projects. A project is a workspace AI remembers. You set the instructions once, and upload the documents that matter. In a marketing project, you will add your voice, your frameworks, your client profiles, your brand guide, and every conversation inside that project builds on what’s already there. My marketing project knows who Danielle is (she’s our ideal client profile, the specific person every piece of content is written for), knows how I write, and knows what we’re building. When I go into draft content, I’m not starting from scratch. I’m continuing a conversation with something that already understands the context.

Read more

I sat with that for a while.

Not because I was afraid of the technology. I was afraid of what it meant for me, for my clients, for the thing I’d spent years getting good at. And I remember thinking: if the machine can do what I do in 45 minutes, what exactly am I offering?

That question turned out to be the wrong one. But it took me longer than I’d like to admit to figure out why.

The real conversation nobody is having

The conversation happening in boardrooms and business forums right now is not actually about AI. It’s about fear dressed up as strategy. Companies announcing mass layoffs and citing AI as the reason. LinkedIn feeds full of takes about which jobs will survive and which won’t. A low-grade panic that most business owners are carrying quietly, because naming it out loud feels like admitting you’re already behind.

Here’s what I’ve watched happen across dozens of businesses over the past year: the founders who are winning with AI are not the ones who went all in on every new tool. They’re the ones who got clear on where they were losing time, where they were losing money, and where the work lived only in their own heads, and then used AI to get it out.

That’s a different conversation than “AI is replacing jobs.” That’s an operator making a decision.

What the headlines get wrong about restructuring

The restructuring excuse is real and it’s worth naming. When a Fortune 500 company lays off 2,000 people and calls it an AI transformation, that is mostly a balance sheet decision with a convenient headline. Headcount reduction with better optics. Small businesses are not in that story. You don’t have the budget to replace your team with software, and you wouldn’t want to. Your clients came to you because of a relationship, a judgment call, a conversation that no model can replicate.

What AI is doing in the businesses I work with is narrower and more useful than the headline version. It’s taking the Sunday night calendar tetris and turning it into a ten-minute review. It’s writing the first draft of a proposal so the client-facing version goes out in thirty minutes instead of two hours. It’s processing a week of unread emails before you get to your desk, so by the time you sit down, the urgent ones are already sorted.

The human relationships, the strategy, the judgment, the trust, none of that is going anywhere. The mundane scaffolding underneath it? That part is negotiable.

The problem nobody wants to talk about

There’s a different problem I see just as often, and it doesn’t get talked about enough.

Some people get access to AI and immediately stop thinking. They paste a question in and take whatever comes back. They let the tool make decisions they should be making themselves. They hand over their voice, their positioning, their client communication, and then wonder why everything sounds generic and nothing converts.

Garbage in, garbage out is not just a technical problem. It’s a mindset problem. AI is a thought partner, not a replacement for your thinking. It works when you bring it real context, real specifics, real standards. It fails when you bring it nothing and expect it to produce something.

The business owners I watch struggle with AI are not struggling because the technology is hard. They’re struggling because they’re trying to skip the part where they have to be clear about what they actually want. AI just makes that lack of clarity very expensive and very fast.

The shift is smaller than you think

The mindset shift that unlocks all of this is smaller than people expect. It’s not “embrace AI” or “become a tech person” or spend a weekend rebuilding your entire operation. It’s one question: where am I spending time on something that happens the same way every single time?

That repetitive task, the one you do on autopilot, the one that no one else can do because it lives only in your head, that’s the starting point. Not because AI will do it perfectly on the first try. It won’t. But because getting it out of your head and into a system is the work you should have been doing anyway, and AI just makes it faster to test.

I went from spending two hours on every client proposal to spending thirty minutes. Not because I stopped caring about quality, but because I stopped starting from zero. The transcript from the call, the structure of a proposal that converted before, my voice and my standards already loaded in, and the first draft is done before I’ve finished my coffee.

That time didn’t disappear. I redirected it. To the sales conversation, to the strategy, to the relationship, to the things that actually require me.

This is what the workshop is built on

Not a feature tour of every AI tool on the market. Not hype about what’s coming. A practical look at where you are right now, where the friction lives in your business and your day, and how to start building the layer that handles the repetitive work so you can focus on the work only you can do.

If you’ve registered and you’re reading this before we meet: come with one thing that costs you more time than it should. That’s your starting point. We’ll build from there.

Join us for the next Work Smarter with AI workshop.

Register for Work Smarter with AI

I facilitated two Work Smarter with AI workshops last week with ten business owners, all of them smart, all of them running real businesses, and every single one of them came in asking the same version of the same question. How do I use AI to speed things up?

Not one of them asked whether their business was ready for it.

That’s the problem I keep running into. Founders are buying into AI the same way they bought into creating a digital course five years ago, the same way they bought into a CRM before they had a sales process, and the same way they hired a team before they had anything for that team to run. They add the tool and wait for the chaos to clear. It doesn’t.

Subscribe now

AI is not a clean-up crew. If your operations are held together by your personal attention, your memory, and your willingness to step in whenever something falls through a crack, adding an AI layer doesn’t fix that. It accelerates it. You get faster chaos, better-looking chaos, and chaos with a summary attached.

I’ve worked alongside founders for fifteen years, and the pattern is consistent enough that I am not surprised when I see it anymore. A $2M firm running on the founder’s instincts, a $5M firm where the team is waiting to be told what to do next, a founder who can’t take a week off without things slipping. These businesses aren’t broken in an obvious way. They run, they generate revenue, and clients are reasonably happy. But the founder is the operating system, and when you try to add AI on top of a fully human-dependent operating system, you don’t get efficiency. You get one more thing the founder has to manage.

The businesses where I’ve seen AI actually change the way work gets done share one thing in common. They already knew what they were doing before the AI touched it.

The unsexy work that makes everything else possible

My own team had a Monday morning problem. We’d meet at 11 am, assign tasks, talk through client work and upcoming milestones, and then the meeting would end. By Tuesday afternoon, maybe Wednesday, it became clear that half of what we discussed hadn’t moved. Not because anyone was lazy. Because the tasks never got created. They lived in the meeting, in someone’s head, and then they quietly dissolved before the next Monday when we’d meet again and go through the same conversation.

The fix looked simple from the outside. But before any automation was possible, I had to know exactly what the process was supposed to be. Who takes the notes. Where the tasks live. How they get assigned. What counts as an action item versus a discussion point. I had to have a system before I could automate one.

Once that was clear, I built a skill that runs every Monday at 12:15 pm. It pulls the Zoom transcript from our team call, reads the AI summary, identifies assigned tasks, and creates them in Notion with the right person attached. By the time I’m done with whatever comes after the meeting, my team’s tasks are already waiting for them. That process hasn’t slipped in weeks.

But if I had tried to build that automation before we figured out how we actually wanted task ownership to work, before we agreed on where tasks live and what the meeting structure should produce, the automation would have just automated the confusion.

That’s the pattern I see playing out everywhere. The founders who get the most from AI are the ones who’ve done the work of documenting what they actually do. The ones who are frustrated with AI are, almost always, the ones who skipped that step.

What the foundations actually look like

I’m not talking about a six-month operational overhaul before you’re allowed to touch AI. I’m talking about being able to answer three things clearly.

What is the process? Not the ideal version of it, the one that actually happens. Who does what, in what order, and where does it break?

What is the output supposed to be? If you can’t describe what done looks like, you can’t tell AI what to produce, and you can’t tell your team either.

Where does it live when it’s finished? A task that gets completed and doesn’t land somewhere useful isn’t finished. It’s just done in someone’s head.

Most founders can’t answer all three for more than a handful of their core processes. That’s not a character flaw, it’s just what happens when you build a business around your own ability to hold things together. You never needed to write it down because you were always there to fill the gap.

AI can’t fill the gap. It can follow instructions and pattern-match against what you’ve given it, but it cannot compensate for a process that was never defined. When people tell me AI isn’t working for them, nine times out of ten, the first issue isn’t the prompt. It’s that the underlying process was never clear enough to hand off to anyone, human or otherwise.

The work nobody wants to sell you

Nobody builds a course called “Document Your Processes.” There’s no waiting list for an SOP workshop. It’s unglamorous, it takes longer than expected, and it requires you to slow down before you can speed up.

But I’ve watched what happens on the other side of it. I’ve watched founders take a week off while their teams handled client work, not because they hired differently, but because the business finally knew what to do without them in the room. I’ve watched Monday meetings stop being the place where good intentions go to die, because the system, after the meeting, does the work that used to depend on someone’s good memory.

The boring infrastructure is what makes the interesting stuff possible. You don’t get the automation without the process. You don’t get the process without the clarity. And you don’t get the clarity by adding another tool. You get it by sitting down and answering the questions you’ve been too busy to answer.

AI is a powerful layer. But it’s only a layer, and whatever is underneath it determines what you actually get.

We were thirty minutes in.

I watched what happened.

A team leader brought up a client issue. She gave the context. She offered her details. Then she turned the question to the CEO.

The project coordinator brought up a scheduling conflict. She named the conflict. She offered two options. Then she turned the decision to the CEO.

Another team lead brought up a deliverable that was behind. She explained why. She suggested a path. Then she turned the final decision over to the CEO.

Subscribe now

Every person on that call had done the work to think. Every person had a recommendation ready. Each person offered the recommendation and waited.

As the CEO, she answered it all. She was good at it. She has been doing this for years.

After the call, she said something I have heard at least forty times.

“I am the only one thinking about how to grow this business. The only one making decisions.”

I want to tell you what was actually happening on that call.

Her team was not failing her. Her team was doing exactly what she had trained them to do.

She had built a business where the team brings their thinking to her for approval. They are smart. They are capable. They are not stupid about their own work. They have just learned over the years that the final word lives with the CEO. So they prepare their work to bring to her. They do not prepare their work to ship.

That is a different muscle.

A team trained to deliver is a team that decides. They make the call. They write the email. They finish the deliverable. The founder hears about it after.

A team trained to NOT deliver is a team that researches, considers, recommends, and waits. The founder hears about it before.

Her team is the second kind. She trained them to be that way without realizing she was doing it. Every time she overruled a decision they made, she taught them to bring her decisions instead of making them. Every time she rewrote an email they had drafted, she taught them their writing was a draft, and hers was the final. Every time she said “I will handle it,” she taught them that “handling it” was her job.

The team got smarter and faster at preparing things for her. She got busier and more drained from having to prepare and approve everything.

That is the leak.

The time you spend approving things your team should have delivered is brain space.

The time you spend rewriting emails is brain space.

The time you spend in your own inbox at 9 pm answering questions that should have been answered without you is brain space.

The time you spend on a team call talking through decisions your team could have made before the meeting started is brain space.

You have a fixed amount of it per week. You cannot grow it. You can only protect it or leak it.

Most CEOs of real businesses leak it all before noon.

Which is why your business has felt stuck for the last twelve months. Why the growth flattened. Why every new idea dies on contact with the day-to-day. You stopped thinking about how to grow it. Not because you got worse. Because you ran out of space.

Last month, I was on a different client call. This was a marketing agency with a team of five members. The founder was telling me about a family trip she had taken.

She showed me her phone.

Slack was full. Not unread messages, she answered all of them. Direct messages from her team. Every one of them was a question. Some of them were urgent. Most of them were not.

“What client should I prioritize on Tuesday morning?”

“Should we send the proposal at the higher price or the lower price?”

“Can I respond to this client this way?”

“Did you want me to use the template or write it fresh?”

She told me she answered them on the plane or at the airport. She answered them in the Uber to the hotel. She answered them while her daughter was eating dinner across from her in a restaurant in another city.

Then she said the line that always tells me what is true:

“Client work pauses when I travel. If I do not answer Slack, things stop.”

That is the same issue as the consulting CEO above. Just on a smaller scale. Five people instead of eleven. The team is trained to bring everything to the CEO. She has built a business that cannot run without her hands on every choice.

She is not the bottleneck because she is bad at delegation. She is the bottleneck because, with the best of intentions, she has taught a five-person team that the answers live in her head.

I have watched this pattern across more than forty businesses. It is the same problem in different costumes. Two-and-a-half-million-dollar consulting firms. Five-person agencies. Solo founders with a VA. Educational businesses. Professional services firms of every size.

The shape is identical. The team is trained to bring. The founder is trained to receive. The brain space leaks.

The conventional wisdom is that the answer is to hire better, train harder, or trust more.

It is not.

You cannot trust your way out of a system you designed. You cannot delegate harder when delegation was never the issue. Better hires do not change the structure. More training does not change the structure.

The structure has to change.

That is the work of The CEO Operating System.

The CEO OS is not a leadership philosophy. It is not a productivity hack. It is the structural redesign of a business that runs on the founder. Three layers, with an AI layer running through all three.

The foundation is The CEO. Identity. Vision. Capacity.
Who she is, what she actually owns, how much room she has to lead.

The engine is Business Operations. Technology. People. Finance.
The structural plumbing that lets the business run without the founder in every seat.

The lifeblood is Business Flow. Marketing. Sales. Fulfillment.
How revenue moves through the business.

Each layer requires the one beneath it. AI runs through all three.

When the system is in place, the team is no longer trained to bring. The decisions get sorted into four buckets before they reach the founder. CEO-only, where her judgment is the asset. Team-owned, where someone else has the authority. Systemized, where a rule replaces the decision. Eliminated, where the activity should not be happening at all. Most founders have one bucket. Their inbox.

The rhythms get designed around the work that actually moves the business. A reactive week is a brain-space-zero week. A designed week protects the thinking time and routes the execution time to the team that owns it.

The roles are drawn in writing rather than by default. The team leader on that call would not have turned the question to her. She would have answered it.

The delivery gets standardized so the quality is in the system, not in the founder’s head. The work goes out the door at the standard the client paid for, without the founder checking it.

Three layers. One redesign. The brain space comes back because the system no longer needs her in every seat.

I want to say something carefully about AI. Because most of what is being sold under that banner right now is wrong.

Prompts are not the answer. AI tools are not the answer. A library of AI workflows is not the answer.

These things are useful. But they sit on top of an operating system. They are not the operating system.

AI on top of operations you haven’t documented is faster chaos. AI on top of documented operations is leverage.

A founder with no operating system who adopts AI gets a faster version of the same dependency. The team still brings every decision to her. The work still requires her sign-off. The system is still broken. AI just makes the brokenness move faster.

A founder with the operating system in place gets something different. AI becomes leverage. It executes the work the team owns. It supports the decisions that have been sorted into a system. It frees the team to do the work that actually requires judgment. And it frees the founder to do the thinking she was hired to do.

AI is the multiplier on top of an operating system that already works.

It is not a substitute. It is what becomes possible after the structural work is done.

The CEO who installs the system first and layers AI on top is the one who wins the next three years. The CEO who skips the system and uses AI to compensate is the one who burns out faster and more expensively, leaving a team more confused than before.

So here is the question.

How much brain space did you have last week?

Not how busy you were.

Not how productive you felt.

How much time did you spend thinking, actually thinking, with no agenda, no decision pending, no team member waiting, about how to grow your business?

If the answer is zero, or close to it, you are not running a business. You are inside one.

The founder who runs a business has brain space. The founder who is run by one does not.

The work is getting it back. The team has to be untrained. The structure has to be redesigned. And then, only then, the AI can do what AI is good at.

That is the order. There is no shortcut.

A note for the founder running a $2M+ firm

If you are running a $2M+ firm and you read this and recognize yourself, the membership is not what you need.

You need brain space. You need it now.

The CEO Partner project engagement is the work of installing the operating system that gives it back to you. We do this inside your business, with your team. By the end, the team has been untrained. The system has been redesigned. The brain space is yours again.

If that is the conversation you are ready to have, this is where to start.

Book a Brain Space Audit

For the founder who is still building

If you are still building toward the $2M mark, this article is your prevention plan.

Training your team to need you does not start at $2M. It starts the day you hire your first contractor. Most founders only notice the problem when the team reaches 10 or 12, and the brain space is gone. The problems start earlier.

Right now, the work is building the operating system as you grow. Do not retrofit it after the business outgrows you. The Global Life Library publishes one tool every week. The same operator IP I install inside firms paying six thousand a month for it, right-sized for where you are now. Each tool is one piece of the system, built before you need it.

Become a Global Citizen

The brain space you are missing is not a personal failure.

It is structural. It is recoverable. And it is the difference between running your business and being run by it.

I’d love to know what you think? Leave a comment below.

Leave a comment

Subscribe now

She said something that stopped me.

She was talking about her kids. She said something to the effect of: I have this many years left with all of them in the house. That is the number.

I stood still.

My daughter Mia turns ten in October. She will be eighteen in eight years. Eight summers. Eight school years. Eight Christmases.

Eight more times to sit at a table I built, with the people I built it for, before she goes off to her own life. University. A job. A partner. On holidays, she wants to spend them somewhere else. Years where I will see her on weekends and holidays, if I am lucky.

Eight.

That is not a metaphor. That is the number.

I am writing this down because once you see it, you cannot un-see it. And once you cannot un-see it, you have to do something with it.

For years I have heard founders ask themselves a quiet question. Sometimes it surfaces at three in the morning. Sometimes it surfaces in a hotel room on a business trip. Sometimes it surfaces on a Sunday night when everyone else is asleep and the office is quiet and you are scrolling on your phone in the dark.

The question is: Is this it?

You do not say it out loud. You feel guilty even thinking it. From the outside, everything you have built is the answer to the question you used to ask yourself in your twenties. The business is making money. The team is in place. The accountant says you are doing fine.

But the question keeps coming back.

I want to tell you something I have come to believe about that question.

It is not a sign that something is wrong.

It is a sign that you have outgrown the design.

The life you have was built by an earlier version of you. She was solving the problems she had then. She was making the trade-offs that made sense in her twenties or her thirties or her early forties. She was not designing for the woman you are now.

The business you have was built the same way. The clients you said yes to. The team you hired. The work you took on because it was available. None of it was designed for the founder you have become. It was designed by the founder who needed to survive that year.

When this question shows up, it is not asking you to burn it down. It is not asking you to sell the business. It is not asking you to book a flight to Bali.

It is asking you a much harder question:

That is the question. And it is bigger than the smaller questions you have been asking yourself instead.

The geography question. Should we move?

The school question. Should we put the kids in an international school?

The sabbatical question. Should I take six months?

The sale question. Should I sell the business?

None of those are the real question. They are the smaller questions you ask when you cannot yet bring yourself to ask the big one.

I have lived in four cities in three countries over the last nine years. We moved our family to Doha in August 2024. I run a business that requires me to be in three time zones at any given moment. I have two daughters who do not know what it feels like to have a single-country childhood. They speak in accents that are not mine.

I made every one of those decisions on purpose.

But the truest thing I can tell you is this: I did not make them all at once, and I did not make them with the eight-Christmases number in front of me.

If I had, the order would have been different. Some of the moves would have been the same, and some would have been smaller. The business decisions in the last five years would have been sharper.

The number changes what you say yes to.

You stop saying yes to the conference that overlaps with the school play.

You stop saying yes to the client who only books Friday afternoons.

You stop saying yes to the launch that lands on the week your kids are home from school.

You start designing the business around the eight Christmases instead of the other way around.

That is not a retreat. That is a design.

Here is what I want you to take from this.

The is this it question is not a crisis. It is a signal. Specifically, it is the signal that the design you have outgrew the trade-offs you were willing to make to build it.

The work is not running away. It is not selling everything. It is not booking a flight.

The work is sitting with the design question long enough to answer it honestly.

If I were designing this from where I am now, what would I design?

What would I keep? What would I cut? What would I have said no to if I had known how few of the years were left? What would I design now, with the number I am holding?

That question changes the answer to every other question on your list. The geography question. The team question. The school question. The marriage question. The business question. All of them get cleaner once the design question is on the table.

I am not telling you what to design.

I am telling you the question is the work.

Pull out a piece of paper. Or do this in your head while you make coffee tomorrow morning. It does not have to be a ritual. It just has to be honest.

How many summers do you have left with the people you built this for?

How many Christmases?

How many ordinary Tuesdays?

Count it. Subtract the ones that are already gone. Subtract the partial ones. Look at the number.

Then ask yourself: Is the life I am running designed around that number, or designed around something else?

If the answer is uncomfortable, you are in good company. Most of us are running a life designed by an earlier version of ourselves who did not have the number in front of her.

The good news is that you have it now.

The next eight years can be designed on purpose.

I am still figuring out what to do with mine. The math is still settling. But I know this much: I am not spending the next eight Christmases the same way I spent the last ten. The business will get redesigned around what I want from those Christmases, not the other way around.

That is not a retreat from work. Work is still important to me. The business is still important to me. I want to build for the next decade with the same intensity I built for the last one.

But the design will be different.

I am glad my daughters are growing up with a worldview I did not have. They have connections to countries I had not even visited at their age. They will grow up able to call several places home. That was a design choice I made before I had the math in front of me.

The rest of the design is being made now. And it is being made on purpose.

You have written the SOPs. Done the training. Bought the tools.

Your team still will not move without you.

You are finishing their work. Signing their paychecks. Reviewing every deliverable before it goes out. Cleaning up the parts that should have been clean already.

At the end of the month, you are wondering if you should even be doing this.

That is not a talent problem.

That is not a management problem.

It is a design problem. And it is fixable.

The business you have built was designed, even if you do not remember designing it.

Every time you said yes to a client who wanted things done your way, you designed it. Every time you stepped in to fix what your team should have caught, you designed it. Every time you said, “easier if I just do it,” you designed it.

This is not your fault. Most founders do not know they are designing the operating layer of their business. They think they are just doing the work.

But the work compounds.

And one day, the design is finished, and the design is you, in the middle of everything.

After a decade of installing operating systems inside seven and eight figure professional services firms, I can tell you the four layers a business runs on.

Decisions.

Rhythms.

Roles.

Delivery.

Whether the team is five people or fifty. Whether revenue is one hundred thousand or fifteen million. When the business is breaking under the weight of its founder, the break is always at one of these four. Sometimes two.

For most of the founders I have worked with, the first break is Decisions. The team cannot move because every choice routes through you. You make the same five decisions every week with no system to govern them.

For some, it is Rhythms. The week was never designed. So the week designs itself, reactively, around whoever is loudest.

For others, it is Roles. The team is willing and capable, but the lines were never drawn. So everyone defaults to “ask the founder.”

And for some, it is Delivery. You built the business by personally guaranteeing the work. You never extracted yourself from the quality layer. So you cannot leave.

You probably already know which one is yours.

Here is what I want you to notice.

You just diagnosed your business in under three minutes.

You read four layers and one of them landed harder than the others. Your stomach dropped a little. You thought of a specific person, or a specific recurring fight, or a specific Sunday night you have lost a hundred times.

That is the diagnosis.

The diagnosis is not the prescription.

You have been here before. You have known the problem was the team, or the systems, or you. You have hired coaches. You have read the books. You have rebuilt the SOPs. You have had the harder conversations. None of it changed the design, because none of it was designing.

Knowing it is a design problem is the start. It is not the fix.

The fix is the work of redesigning each layer, one at a time, in the right order, with the right move at each turn. That work does not happen by accident. It happens because someone walks you through it.

That is the work I do with my clients. And that is the work I am now making available to readers of Global Life Project.

Becoming a Global Citizen

Global Life Project has a membership. It is called the Global Life Library.

Every week, members get a tool, a template, a framework, or a system from the same intellectual property I install inside seven and eight figure firms. Right-sized for founders running smaller teams. The Library grows every week. Members keep access to everything.

This week, the first thing in the Library is Do Less, Better. A private audio series. Eight episodes. Eight to fifteen minutes each. The exact thinking I walk clients through at the start of an engagement.

Inside, I take you through each of the four layers. What each one looks like when it is broken, what the redesign actually requires, and the first move at each turn.

Membership is $25 a month. My agency retainer is six thousand. The difference is the price of the access.

Subscribe now

Read more

You didn’t build your business to be the only one holding it together.

You built it for freedom. For family. For options.

But somewhere along the way, your time got hijacked.

You became the bottleneck.

The safety net.

The system.

And now, even though the business works, you’re wondering…

Is this really it?

You’re not stuck because you don’t know how to work.

You’re stuck because the way you’re working doesn’t work anymore.

Do Less, Better is your Reset.

Not another strategy download. Not another fluffy mindset podcast.

This is real talk about what it takes to step out of over-functioning and build a business that runs—with or without you in every role.

You’ve done the hard part. You built it.

Now it’s time to build smarter.

It’s the real conversation behind the scenes on a sustainable scale.

Read more

Today I want to write to the mother who is building something while raising people.

Maybe you are building a business. Maybe you are building a different life for your family in a different country. Maybe you are building both at the same time, which is what most mothers I know are actually doing.

Either way. You are the one staying up late after everyone else has gone to bed, working on something that matters to you. You are the one researching schools, pricing offers, or sketching the next year on a piece of paper at the kitchen table. You are the one wondering if there is a way to do this without losing yourself in the process.

I see you.

The courage to want more than what you were handed

There is a particular kind of courage in admitting that the life you built, even one that looks fine from the outside, is not the life you actually want.

The world tells mothers to be grateful and quiet. To take what they have without asking for more. To put everyone else first and call that love.

You have figured out something different. Your well-being and your family’s well-being are not in competition. They are the same thing, designed two different ways.

The business that runs you is not separate from the life that runs you. The life that runs you is not separate from the business that built it. Most mothers I know are trying to fix one without fixing the other, and that is why nothing changes.

If you are building a different life, you cannot do it on top of a business that owns your time. If you are building a different business, you cannot do it on top of a life with no room. The two have to be designed together, or the design holds for a while before breaking.

What I learned moving with two daughters

I have moved my family three times in nine years. London to Copenhagen. Copenhagen to London. London to Doha, where I am now.

Two daughters, seven and nine. A husband. A business that kept running while we kept moving.

What I learned, moving them, is not what most people write about when they write about moving abroad.

I learned that the move was the easy part. The hard part was building a business underneath the life that could survive being uprooted three times. The hard part was making sure my work could move when we moved. The hard part was making sure the life I was claiming for my daughters did not require me to be exhausted to sustain it.

The mother who tells you the move was hard is telling you only part of the truth. The whole truth is that the move was hard because the life and the business were not designed together. When they are designed together, the move is just logistics.

Three things I want you to do this week

Not five. Three. Because the mother reading this on Mother’s Day does not have time for five.

1. Notice which fear is which.

There are two kinds of fear that show up at 2 a.m. when you are thinking about changing your life.

The first kind is fear of solving a logistical problem. School systems. Visas. Currency. Time zones. Tax structures. Hiring a new contractor. Saying no to a client. These are all real and solvable.

The second kind is fear that the life you have is misaligned with what you actually want. This one does not feel like a problem to solve. It feels like a quiet ache that does not go away.

The first kind has answers. The second kind has decisions.

Notice which one is talking before you decide what to do about it.

2. Find one mother who has already done what you are thinking about.

Not five. One. Reach out and ask her the question that has been keeping you up.

The mother who has already done it has wisdom that no book or course can give you. She has lived through the parts you are afraid of. Her answer to your specific question will be more useful than a hundred articles.

If you do not know any mother who has done what you are thinking about, that is information. It tells you that the path you are considering is rare enough that you are going to have to design parts of it yourself. That is not a reason not to do it. That is a reason to take your own thinking seriously.

3. Protect the time you spend designing the life, not just executing it.

Most mothers I know spend all their time executing the life they already have. They do not have time to design the next one.

You will not stumble into the life you actually want. You will design it in a notebook or a doc, or in half an hour with a cup of coffee on a Saturday morning, and then you will execute the design.

If you do not protect the design time, you will execute the life you already have, forever.

This week, set aside 30 minutes for design. Just thirty. Sit with what you actually want, not what you are supposed to want. Write it down.

The execution will follow.

What I believe about mothers building something

A mother’s intuition about what her family needs is rarely wrong.

A mother’s intuition about what she herself needs is also rarely wrong, but mothers have been trained for generations to ignore that one. We are taught to override our own knowing in service of everyone else’s comfort.

You do not have to.

The pull you feel toward something more, something different, something better, is information. It is not selfishness. It is not midlife restlessness. It is not a phase. It is your knowing, telling you something true about the design of your life.

Listen to it.

I am glad you are here.

— Sonaya

If this letter found you, the rest of this Substack might be for you too. Sundays are for life decisions. Wednesdays are for business decisions. Both, because they are the same decision, made twice.

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

For about a year, I was convinced this Substack was about building a life abroad.

That was true. It was also not enough.

I wrote about the move. The schools. The visas. The bank accounts. The morning a country starts to feel like home. I interviewed people who had done it. I told my own story.

From New Jersey. To London in 2015. To Copenhagen in 2016. Back to London in 2021. Now in the Middle East in Doha, Qatar, as of August 2024.

Two kids. A husband. A business that kept running while we kept moving.

What I left out is the part that made the moves actually work.

The business underneath them.

Here is what I never said out loud on this Substack.

The only reason the moves worked is because the business held up. The only reason the business held up is because of the operating system I had been building inside other people’s companies and my own for over ten years.

I split the conversation in half. Life over here. Business over there.

The people I am actually built to help do not live that way.

You do not get to leave the business at the airport.

You do not get to fantasize about a slower week without looking at who, exactly, is going to do the work that has your name on it.

The life decision and the business decision are one and the same.

So I was telling you half the truth. Here is the other half.

Who am I?

I am Sonaya Williams.

Wife of ten years. Mom to two daughters, ages seven and nine. Business owner for fifteen years.

I have lived in three different countries with my family over the past nine years.

That is the personal side.

Here is the working side.

For the last decade, I have been the CEO Partner. That is the agency I run. We come in when a founder has built something successful and is now stuck inside it. The business is making money. The founder is exhausted. Every decision still goes through them. Nothing moves without them.

We install the operating system underneath the business. The one that removes the founder as the bottleneck.

We call it the CEO Operating System, or CEO OS.

It is not a course.

It is the actual structure a business runs on.

Decisions. Rhythms. Roles. Money. Delivery. Team.

When the CEO OS is in place, the founder gets their brain back. I like to call it Brain Space.

When it is not, the founder keeps solving the same problems on a different week.

Why I cannot sell that to you… yet

The full CEO Partner engagement is built for businesses that already have a team and serious revenue.

If you are reading this, that is probably not you yet.

The math does not work. Not because the work is not worth it. Because it was built for a business three or four steps ahead of where you are right now.

That is the gap I am closing here.

What am I actually doing?

I am taking the CEO OS, the same intellectual property I install inside the businesses I work with, and I am right-sizing it for the solo and lean operator.

The one person shop. The founder plus a virtual assistant. The founder, plus two contractors, and a podcast editor. The person trying to get to six figures and feel like the business is already heavier than it should be.

Same IP.

Smaller frame.

Tools you can actually use, right now.

This is where being a Global Citizen becomes real. Honest writing about what it takes to run a business that does not need you in every seat.

Inside the Global Life Library are the tools. Every post includes a tool, a template, a framework, or a system you can use the same week. Every tool, template, framework, and system stays inside the Global Life Library.

How will this Substack run every week?

One life article. One business article. Every week.

Sundays are for life decisions. Where to live. When to move. How to design a footprint that fits your family. The big calls that have nothing to do with a P&L and everything to do with the shape of your year.

Wednesdays are for business decisions. What to install. What to stop doing. How to run a small operation without becoming the operation.

The two frameworks I work from

There are two. They do different jobs.

The Global Citizens Framework is the lens through which Sundays are viewed.

The life lens.

It has three phases.

Desire. Should I? Direction. Where do I? Design. When do I?

It works if you are literally moving abroad. It also works as a model for any operator making a big call. Should I take this on? Where does it go? When do I commit?

The CEO Operating System is the lens through which Wednesdays are viewed.

The business lens.

How the business runs. Where the leaks are. What to install first. What to stop doing entirely.

A note on location

The title of this Substack is Global Life Project.

But here is what I want you to hear:

Location is the differentiator. Not the requirement.

You do not need to leave the country to belong here.

The systems work in Cleveland. They work in Croatia. They work in Cairo. They work wherever you are.

I built a business that doesn’t require me to leave my desk. A team across three countries, clients who don’t need to see my office, and a calendar that mostly belongs to me. The default setting is to stay there and let the work do the talking.

But the work doesn’t introduce you to a woman with a daughter the same age as mine. The work doesn’t put you in a room with another founder making the same kind of decisions you are. That part is on me.

So this year I’m choosing it. More coffees, more in-person meetings, more saying yes when someone suggests we actually get together. It isn’t my natural mode. It’s the mode I’m building into.

And it’s how I ended up sitting across from her last week, hearing that despite everything happening in the world, she’s still planning her move to Doha.

That stayed with me.

Not because it surprised me. I’ve lived here long enough to know what this place actually is, versus what the news tells you it is. I feel safer here than I would in the States. My kids walk into school every day. Life keeps moving. If anything were to shift, the government here knows how to hold the line.

That’s not the feeling I had growing up in America.

I’m old enough to remember bomb threats clearing out the school for the afternoon. We treated it like an inconvenience. A break in the day. Now my friends back home are dropping their kids off at schools with active shooter protocols printed in the parent handbook. Daily news cycles of children who didn’t come home. That isn’t a backdrop I’m willing to give my kids. It’s not the feeling I want them to inherit.

So when this woman told me she was still planning her move, I understood it instantly. But what struck me was something quieter underneath it.

That’s the part most people skip.

Most lives are absorbed, not designed. You stay where you grew up because that's where you grew up. You raise your kids the way you were raised because that’s the script you have. You build the business everyone else is building because that’s what’s in front of you. And one day you look up and notice that the life you have isn’t the one you would have chosen if anyone had asked you to choose.

The founders I work with are a particular version of this.

Technically, they’re free to live anywhere. They run remote businesses. They have laptops, passports, and clients. What they don’t have is a business that can survive their absence. The whole thing runs through them. Decisions, quality, context, problem-solving. All of it routes back to one person.

I watched an old video yesterday. My daughter was seven months old, and we were on a surprise trip to Florida to see my Aunt for Mother’s Day. This was before Copenhagen. Before Doha. Before any of this life I have today, and it brought tears.

The trade-off is real, and I won’t pretend otherwise. My girls have an extraordinary relationship with their grandmother on their dad’s side. They see her often. I’m genuinely grateful for that. But my mom, the grandmother on my side, is in America. What they have with her is FaceTime. Long calls, regular ones, real love. Not the same as a Sunday dinner or a weekend at grandma’s house.

I miss that for them. I miss it for me.

But here’s what I keep coming back to.

A global life isn’t a lifestyle choice. It’s an operational one. The trade-offs are real, and they’re chosen, not absorbed by accident. You can only choose them, weigh them, design around them, if the business you’ve built can run without you holding it together every day.

That’s the whole game for me right now. Not lifestyle design. Operational design. Building the kind of company that gives you the room to make the global decision, whatever yours turns out to be.

Hers is Doha.

Mine, for now, is the same.

Yours might be something else entirely.

The point is that you get to decide!

Subscribe now

Subscribe now

Marcus has eleven people on his team.

He’s been in business for years. The work is good. Clients renew. Revenue grows. On paper, he runs a real company.

In practice, he runs himself.

Projects miss deadlines. Deliverables sit waiting on his review. Client reports go out late because nobody else has the context. The team works in silos… each person heads down on their own work, with no visibility into what anyone else is doing and no shared understanding of where the business is going. Everything routes through Marcus. Every decision. Every escalation. Every strategic question.

He hired all eleven of those people to take work off his plate. The work is technically off his plate. But he’s still buried.

This isn’t a Marcus problem. This is the problem with most 10 to 50-person professional services firms, and it’s the problem I see most sharply with the founders who tell me they want to build a business that gives them the freedom to live and work from anywhere. The ones who want to spend a season in Lisbon, build the international arm of their company, spend three weeks with their kids in the summer, or finally stop being on the phone during their kid’s football game. They can’t do any of it. Not really. Because the company can’t function without them in the chair.

The founder hires to offload tasks, the team executes those tasks, everyone is busy, nothing is broken, and the founder is still the only person in the building who thinks about business growth.

That’s not a team. That’s a roster.

A team thinks together. A team makes decisions without you. A team understands how the business makes money and acts accordingly. A roster shows up, does the work assigned, and goes home. Both can be capable. Only one is actually a company. And only one gives the founder a life that doesn’t have to be lived inside the four walls of the business.

The hire-to-fill-gaps trap

Here’s what I see over and over. A founder hits 8 or 10 people and starts feeling the strain. So they hire:

✔️ A project manager to chase deadlines.

✔️ An account lead to handle clients.

✔️ A coordinator to keep things moving.

Each hire solves a specific pain point. Each hire is justified.

But hiring to fill a gap is not the same thing as hiring to build a company.

When you hire to fill a gap, you’re hiring someone to execute a task you used to do. The job description is a list of responsibilities. The performance review is whether the tasks got done. The relationship stays transactional. You give them work, they give you output, you pay them, repeat.

When you hire to build a company, you’re hiring someone to think about a part of the business. Not just execute, but own. Not just deliver, but improve. Not just respond to your direction, but bring you direction back. Their job description includes responsibility for outcomes you no longer need to drive personally.

The first kind of hire takes work off your plate. The second kind takes the thinking off your plate.

Most founders only ever do the first kind. Then they wonder why, at 25 people, they’re more exhausted than they were at 5, and why every time they try to take a real trip, the company starts wobbling within 48 hours of them logging off.

“I can’t afford five strategic leaders.”

The pushback I hear most often is some version of: “I can’t afford to hire five strategic people into a 25-person firm. That’s not realistic.”

It’s not realistic. And it’s not the point either.

You’re not supposed to hire five strategic leaders. You’re supposed to build them. Out of the people you already have.

The reason most founders haven’t done this isn’t budget. It’s two other things, and both are uncomfortable to admit.

The first is that founders quietly enjoy being the only strategic brain in the room. It feels like leadership. It looks like vision. It’s actually a bottleneck wearing a cape, but in the moment, the founder being the smartest person in the company feels like the company is well-led. Letting other people develop strategic muscle means letting them be wrong sometimes, push back, see things you don’t, and ultimately operate at a level you can’t always control. That’s harder than being the hero.

The second is more practical. Most founders have hired good people and then immediately buried them in the same kind of repetitive, low-leverage work that’s burying the founder.

❌ Status updates.

❌ Deadline chasing.

❌ Meeting prep.

❌ Email triage.

❌ Document formatting.

❌ Manual data pulls.

The team can’t think strategically because they don’t have time to think. They’re spending every hour of their day on work that AI should be doing now.

This is the part most consultants get wrong. They tell founders to “delegate more“ or “hire smarter“ or “build a leadership team.“ Useful advice in theory. Impossible in practice when your existing team is drowning.

You can’t develop leaders out of people who don’t have the brain space to lead.

What changes when the work changes

This is where AI comes in and where most operators are still asking the wrong question about it.

The question isn’t “how can AI make my team faster?” Faster at what?

If the work is already low-leverage, doing it faster just means more low-leverage work per hour. That’s not transformation. That’s productivity theatre.

The right question is “what work should my team not be doing at all?”

Marcus’s account lead spends maybe two hours a day on status updates, follow-up emails, and client report formatting. None of that is the job he was hired for. He was hired to own client relationships, anticipate problems, and grow accounts. He’s not doing that work because he doesn’t have time. The status updates and the formatting eat his calendar.

If AI handles the status updates and the formatting, the account lead doesn’t get faster. He gets different. He gets two hours a day to think about clients instead of processing them. He gets the brain space to notice the things only a human can notice… the early warning signs of churn, the unspoken expansion opportunity, the team dynamic that’s about to break a project. That’s leadership-level work. He couldn’t do it before because he was busy.

Multiply that across eleven people, and Marcus suddenly has a company instead of a roster.

That’s the shift. Not “AI makes you faster.” AI takes over the work that was preventing your team from operating at the level you actually hired them for. The team becomes the leaders the company needs, not by hiring new people, but by giving the existing people the space to grow into it.

The freedom this actually buys

Here’s what most articles about AI and operations leave out.

The reason this matters isn’t operational efficiency. It’s not productivity gains. It’s not even revenue, though revenue follows.

The reason it matters is what it gives the founder back.

I work with global founders. People building companies across the Middle East, Europe, and North America, sometimes all three at once. The pattern is the same everywhere. They started a business because they wanted freedom. The freedom to build something of their own. The freedom to choose how they spend their days. The freedom to live where they want, work with who they want, and not have to ask anyone’s permission to take their kids out of school for a month and put them in a school in another country.

And then the business they built to give them that freedom became the thing that took it away.

They can’t relocate, because the company can’t function across time zones without them. They can’t take a real holiday, because the team can’t make decisions without checking in. They can’t move to the city they actually want to live in, because their people and clients all expect them to be reachable in a specific window. The business they built to live the life they wanted now dictates the life they get to live.

A real team… the kind built on an AI-led operating model and distributed strategic ownership is the structural answer to that. Not because AI gives you your time back. Because it gives the people around you the brain space to operate without you. Which means you finally get to operate from anywhere. Live anywhere. Spend your time on what actually matters to you, in the places that actually matter to you, with the people who actually matter to you.

That’s the freedom. Not lifestyle design. Operational design.

Why is this the work?

This is the work I’m doing now. Not “AI implementation” in the consultant sense like picking tools, running pilot projects, mandating adoption from the top down. That’s how most AI initiatives fail in firms this size. The leadership team buys in; the rest of the company resists. Six months later, there’s a Notion doc nobody reads and three abandoned automations.

The work is bottom up. The team learns to see AI differently. They learn what it can actually do. They apply it to their own roles, in their own day, on the work they want off their plate. They each own a skill area. They each install the question “how can AI support me with this?” as their default thinking pattern.

What surfaces in that process, and this is the part most founders don’t expect, is everything that’s been broken in the business all along. The unclear handoffs. The undocumented decisions. The missing process. The role boundaries that were never set. The strategic gaps were always covered by the founder’s heroics.

The work the team does on AI begins to reveal the work the company actually needs. And then, finally, you can do that work because you have the people and the brain space to do it.

This is what real freedom looks like for a founder. A company that thinks alongside you. A team that doesn’t need you to be the bottleneck. A business that can grow without breaking the person who built it and that lets you build the life you actually want, in the places you actually want to live, with the time you actually want to spend.

That’s the work. That’s what I’m building.

If this resonates, subscribe. I write weekly about AI-led business operations, what it actually takes to build a real team, and how global founders of 10- to 50-person firms are restructuring their companies to run them from anywhere. If you know a global founder who needs to read this, share it with them.

“I always thought you would have moved away long after you graduated from college,“ she said.

Ten years had passed since graduation. I had met Duane, built a business, and was finally doing the thing she apparently always knew I would do. She saw it in me before I could see it in myself.

I was the one who loved change. The one who always found a way to do something different, go somewhere new, push past what was familiar. Even as a kid, I was comfortable with the uncomfortable.

That probably came from my mother.

What I saw growing up

My mother is an immigrant. She raised me alone, and she worked multiple jobs, long hours, in a career she had not chosen for herself but worked because it paid the bills.

She was a staff accountant at a manufacturing company. Stable. Reliable. Not her choice.

I watched her do that for years. I watched her be the mother who dropped you off and picked you up, but was never really there, not because she didn’t want to be, but because the life she was living did not allow for it.

I was a latchkey kid. In the sixth grade at ten years old, the same age my daughter Mia will be next year. I was putting myself on and off the school bus. I had a key. I had a routine. I would call my mom at work when I got home so she knew I was safe. No one was allowed inside when I was alone. It was afternoon snacks, cartoons, and homework, by myself, until she got back.

I want you to sit with that image for a second. Because that image is what built everything that came after it.

I knew then, not in words, but in the way that children know things before they can articulate them, that someday I wanted something different for my own children.

I didn’t know yet what that would look like or how long it would take to build.

The job that showed me what I couldn’t have

When I started working, I was in the office by 8 am to beat the morning rush and stayed past 6 pm to miss the evening one. Most nights I was working in front of the TV. It was never a 9-to-5. I traveled across the country constantly. I was good at my job, and I knew it.

But I also knew something else.

I could not have that job and keep the promise I had made to myself about the kind of mother I wanted to be. The two could not coexist. The job required a version of me that left no room for the version I was trying to build toward.

So I started looking into entrepreneurship. Not because I had a burning passion for running a business, but because I needed a different structure. I needed to be in control of my own time in a way that a corporate job would never allow.

I started The CEO Partner in April 2011. From my dining room table. In my one-bedroom condo in North Brunswick, New Jersey.

And the day I replaced my six-figure corporate salary with work I had created for myself was the first someday that became real.

The someday I didn’t know I was building toward

When I moved from New Jersey to London, something else shifted.

Because I had the business, I had been able to build a proper relationship with Duane. I could take six-week trips to visit him because I was not sitting in an office with the standard ten days of annual vacation. I could be present for the relationship in a way that a corporate job would never have permitted.

And then we had Mia. In London.

And then Elise. In Copenhagen.

And then I was living a version of my someday that I had never specifically imagined but that was, in every way that mattered. This was exactly what I had been working toward since I was ten years old putting myself on a school bus.

I kept the business running as a boutique agency with a small team. That structure allowed me to take real maternity leave… not the kind where you check emails from the hospital. When I came back, I was able to get support at home. Someone we trusted. Someone who allowed me to be home and working with my daughter in the same space, present in the way my mother never got to be, until Mia started nursery at twelve months and Elise at thirteen.

Because of the time difference between Europe and my US clients, I had my mornings with my daughters. I worked in the afternoons. I had built, without fully realizing I was building it, the architecture of the life I had decided I wanted when I was a child, sitting alone in a house in New Jersey, waiting for my mother to come home at night.

This is where the free version of this article ends.

What comes next is the part that is actually for you.

Up next is a direct conversation about what your someday actually requires… not the inspiration, the operational reality. What it took to build a business that could move across time zones and countries. What the global decision framework looks like when it is applied to motherhood, money, and the life you keep saying you will build later. And the honest question I want to ask you about the someday you have been carrying.

This is what your premium subscription is built for. The full picture, not the highlight reel.

If you are ready to stop leaving your someday in the future, this is where that work starts.

→ Upgrade to read the full article. Cancel anytime.

Read more

I did not expect how good it would feel to just be here again. In our routine. In our home. In the place that actually belongs to us in the way that only the place you have chosen can belong to you.

The last piece I wrote was about leaving. About the evacuation, the US Embassy messages, the airport being closed, and the pizza on the kitchen table. About booking our flights back from London, and the people who asked why we would go back.

This is the other side of that story.

What normal looks like here

The kids are in school. The shops are open. The restaurants are full or fullish. The city is doing what cities do when the worst doesn’t happen: it continues.

But it is a quieter normal than before.

About ten children left my daughters’ schools to repatriate to their home countries. Some families who left have not come back. Some will not come back at all. You feel those absences. In the classroom, in the neighborhood, and in the WhatsApp groups that are a little less active than they were three months ago.

When it first started on Feb 28th, we had Al Jazeera, CNN, or BBC on all day. I could not stop watching. And then I started paying attention to the gap between what was on the screen and what was outside my window, and the gap was significant.

What was being shown on mainstream news in America was not a true representation of what was happening on the ground here. I have said this before, and I will keep saying it. The Middle East portrayed on Western television is not the one I live in. It never has been.

What I live in is a city that is genuinely beautiful. A culture that is warm and generous in ways that took me by surprise when we first arrived and continues to take me by surprise. A place that was, before all of this, finally starting to appear on people’s radar in a different way. People were putting it on their vacation list. They were not afraid to visit. They were curious.

I believe everyone should experience this part of the world at least once. Not because it is perfect, nowhere is, but because the version of it that most people carry in their heads from the news bears almost no resemblance to what is actually here.

That saddens me. That is one of the things this conflict has cost that nobody is counting.

“What is your president doing?”

Someone asked me where I was from recently.

When I told them, they looked at me and said, “What is your president doing?”

My immediate instinct, and I mean immediate, before I had even finished processing the question, was to say: he is not my president. I did not vote for him. I have not lived in that country since 2015.

I am embarrassed to be American right now.

I do not say that lightly. I built everything I have in America. My mother is there. My history is there. I have spent years being careful about how I talk about the country I am from.

But how do you watch the leader of the free world publicly say he is going to eliminate an entire civilization, after saying he started a war to save them and give them freedom, and feel anything other than shame?

The impact one person can have on the world through a single social media post is something I am still processing. That this is the reality we are living in, that the trajectory of a region, of lives, of how the world sees itself, can shift because of what someone types on their phone, is genuinely difficult to sit with.

Before we left for London, a delivery driver asked me where I was from.

I told him London.

The summer we won’t be going

We have canceled our plans to travel to America this summer.

I sit with that sentence for a moment because it still feels strange to write.

Part of me is sad about it. Genuinely sad. There are people there I miss. There are things I was looking forward to. And there is something particular about the sadness of choosing not to go to the place you are used to; it is a different kind of loss than simply not being able to go.

But I believe it is the right decision for my family right now.

I was also due to travel for a business trip next week. But replaced myself with a team member. It was not a difficult decision, but it was not a comfortable one either.

I know I am not alone in this. I have spoken to other people I know personally, who have made the same call. Canceled summer trips. Rerouted travel. Quietly deciding that right now, in this particular moment, America is not where they need to be.

I fear what will happen if this does not end soon. Not just to the people most directly affected, though, that fear is the largest and the loudest. But how Americans are seen and treated everywhere else in the world. To what it means to carry that passport. To the long work of rebuilding something that is being dismantled faster than most of us can track.

The world will not be the same after this period ends. That is not pessimism. That is just what I can see from where I am standing.

I do not have a framework for you today.

I do not have a lesson, a next step, or a pillar of the Global Citizens Framework that neatly applies.

I just have this. What it is like to be here, right now, in this week, in this city that is quiet in a way it was not before.

Stay safe out there. Wherever you are.

— Sonaya

We are real friends. The kind where I knew the details, the late-night conversations with Toby, the pivot from Johannesburg after Lyric had already fallen in love with a school she saw online, and told her mom she wanted to go there because she saw the pool. The “we’re doing it” energy in July that somehow didn’t become “okay we’re really doing it” until September.

This week, I interviewed her on Substack.

And when I asked her what she would do differently, I got exactly what I expected from Nadia… the full, honest answer.

She did it. But she did it the hard way.

Let me tell you what Nadia’s process actually looked like.

The election happened. Lyric turned 10. Toby (her husband) got laid off two days after coming back from the holidays. She called it a culmination. I call it the universe removing every reason to wait.

So she started researching. Mexico. Panama. Thailand. Costa Rica. Spain. South Africa. At some point on a Saturday morning, half awake and scrolling, she asked ChatGPT which African country had the easiest immigration process.

Mauritius came up.

She had never been. She didn’t visit before she moved. She found a couple who did a ninety minute information session for a hundred dollars, watched Toby’s face shift from skeptical to “I think this might work,” and kept going.

They started packing seriously after Thanksgiving. They drove cross-country to Florida on December 16th. They landed in Mauritius on January 14th.

In her words, hot mess express!

But what she said next is what stayed with me.

“We wasted months of the year where we weren’t doing anything to prepare.”

Not because she isn’t smart. Not because she wasn’t committed. Because she didn’t have a plan for how to use the time she had.

She got there. And it is beautiful.

I want to be clear about something before I go further.

Nadia is living her life on an island in the Indian Ocean. Lyric (her daughter), who has been quietly struggling in her US school and has had her confidence chipped away year by year, is coming home excited. She signed up for a woodworking class on her first school break. She told her mum she is going to ace the spelling test.

Nadia is running her sales agency from Mauritius. She has a 10-year residency. She made it!

She got there.

I just want you to see what it cost her to get there without a framework, because I think you are in the process of making exactly the same move she made.

The thing she said that I cannot stop thinking about

Toward the end of our interview, I asked her what she wished she had done differently.

She didn’t hesitate.

“I probably thought more about preparing the house to go on the market than I thought about the business. I had a checklist for that. I just didn’t have that checklist for the business.”

She was trying to build the systems she needed three months before leaving. While also selling a house. While also managing a cross-country move. While also making sure Lyric was okay. While also making sure Toby was okay. While also running a sales agency with clients who still needed her.

“You forget things. You’re making decisions under duress, and you just forget.”

That sentence hit me hard. Because I have been that person. We moved from the UK to Doha, and even with everything I knew and all the moves behind me, the framework I had been building for years, there were still moments where I was juggling too much at once, and something fell through the cracks.

Now imagine doing it without any of that. Without a structure. Without someone whose job it was to think about the business while your mind was elsewhere.

That is the version of this move that most people are making.

Your current actions reflect where you currently are

Here is the honest thing I want to say to you.

If you are in the “we’re thinking about it” phase, researching countries, watching YouTube videos, having the conversation at the dinner table that starts hypothetical and gets uncomfortably real, your actions are reflecting that.

You are doing closet clean outs when you should be auditing your business dependency.

You are researching visa options for three countries, but you have not yet identified your non-negotiables.

You are having conversations with your partner that go in circles because neither of you has a structure to land in.

This is not a criticism. This is just what moving without a framework looks like. I have seen it enough times now to recognize it immediately. And I saw it in Nadia’s timeline.

January to June: great idea, doing some research.

June to September: more conversations, maybe.

September: let’s do it.

October, November: okay, now we are actually doing this.

After Thanksgiving: we are packing.

She didn’t need more time. She needed a plan that told her what to do with the time she had, from the very first month.

Read more

Dr. Nadia Brown didn’t start 2024 planning to liquidate her Arizona home, sell two cars, dismantle a thriving agency, and relocate her family 11 time zones away to an island most Americans can’t place on a map. But by January 2025, she was unpacking suitcases in Mauritius with her husband and 10-year-old daughter, having executed an inte…

Read more

In 21 days, I have spent more money on gas, activities, and just existing than I care to admit. Last week, I took my daughters out for an afternoon, nothing extravagant, just the kind of thing you do on a Tuesday when you have two young girls who need to move their bodies and see the world. I spent £90 / $120 before we’d done anything that qualified as memorable.

Subscribe now

In Doha, that afternoon would have cost me almost nothing.

I miss my life.

I miss the weather. I miss the ease of it. I miss the version of myself that existed there. The one who wasn’t calculating the cost of every outing, who didn’t feel the low grade financial anxiety that comes with living somewhere that was not built for the way I want to live.

So, we are going back.

I know some people will find that surprising. We left ten days after the war started with two checked bags and one carry-on per person. This kind of packing happens when you don’t know how long you will be gone. We landed in London on March 9th. People expected us to stay. To make the decision that most people make when things feel unstable, which is to retreat to the familiar and stick with what looks safer from the outside.

But here is what I need you to understand.

Being in Doha is not what it looks like on the news. The news is not showing you what is actually happening on the ground. The news is showing you the story that gets the most clicks, the footage that creates the most fear, the narrative that keeps you watching.

I feel safer in the Middle East than I would in the United States right now.

We are the last of our friend group to return to Doha. Friends with children younger than ours went back after one week away. For them, it is the support with their kids and their household that they missed. The infrastructure of a life that actually holds you. They did not hesitate to return.

What really happened when the war started?

When the situation escalated, we received messages from the US Embassy telling us we needed to evacuate immediately or risk not receiving government support later. The message was urgent & clear: get out now, or you are on your own.

There was one problem.

The Doha airport was closed. No flights were departing. There was no way to leave, even if we wanted to. And yet the messages from the US Embassy kept coming evacuate now, evacuate immediately, here is your warning.

How, exactly?

No answer to that. No logistics. No support for the actual human problem of getting two children out of a country. Just the instruction and the implied threat that not following it would have consequences.

This is what American support for its citizens abroad looks like in practice. No care. No coordination. A message that protects the government from accountability while leaving the actual citizens to figure it out.

I have spent a long time being careful about how I talk about America. I built my life and my business there. My mother is there. My history is there.

But this moment clarified something I had been feeling for years without quite being able to name it.

The country that started this war put its own citizens in harm’s way and then sent us a message telling us to leave, with no way to do so. And then went quiet.

That is not a government that sees you. That is a government that manages optics.

What Qatar did instead.

In the days that followed, something else happened. Something I did not expect to affect me as much as it did.

The Qatari government communicated clearly. Not perfectly. No government manages a crisis perfectly, but with a consistency and a care that felt genuinely different from what I was receiving from the other direction.

The expat community people I have known for less than a year came together in a way I have never experienced anywhere I have lived. Information shared in real time. Reassurances that were grounded in reality, not false comfort. A network of people who showed up for each other because that is what you do.

One family took my daughters for a few hours so they could play with their friends. Not because they felt obligated. I came back to find them eating pizza and fries, their favorite meal, that someone had bought without being asked.

I stood in that kitchen and felt something I do not feel enough.

Held.

I have lived in the United States, the UK, Copenhagen, and now Doha. I know what community looks like across each of those cultures. I know what it feels like to live somewhere as an outsider, to build friendships slowly, to be surrounded by people who are kind but fundamentally not your people.

What I have in Doha, from people I have known for a fraction of the time, is something I have never found in America. Not many friends from America have come to visit me in any of the countries I have lived in. That is a story for another time. But it tells you something.

The loneliness of American life is something nobody talks about honestly. The way you can live on a street for ten years and never really know your neighbors. The way friendship requires so much scheduling and effort that it eventually becomes another thing you are failing to maintain. The way community, real community, is something you have to build yourself entirely.

I did not know how much I needed something different until I was standing in a kitchen in a moment of genuine uncertainty, watching someone else’s child hand my daughter a slice of pizza, knowing it was given with love.

Why are we going back?

When we booked our flights back to Doha, some people were surprised. A few asked if we were sure. One person asked how I could possibly feel safe going back to the Middle East right now.

I asked them how safe they felt in America.

That question tends to end the conversation.

I am not going back because I am naive about the situation or because I am ignoring the geopolitical reality. I am going back because, as a family, we have done the work of the global decision. We know our non-negotiables. We know our risk capacity. I know what my family needs to thrive and not just to function, but to actually live well.

And the place that gives us that right now is in the Middle East, in Doha, Qatar.

The weather. The cost of living. The ease. The community. The way my daughters get to grow up knowing what it feels like to be genuinely cared for by people who are not family. The way I get to run my business from a place that supports the life I want to live, not one that extracts everything I have just to keep pace.

London is beautiful. It is familiar. It is expensive, grey, and heavy in the particular way that cities are exhausting when they are not yours.

But it’s not home.

Leave a comment